Please observe: On this article, the time period ‘girls’ is used inclusively to embody all people who menstruate or have menstruated, no matter gender identification.
Let’s be clear: Entry to actual, evidence-based well being data shouldn’t be controversial—however right here we’re.
In a political local weather the place girls’s our bodies are continuously underneath hearth, the quiet erasure of greater than 8,000 pages from federal well being web sites isn’t simply suspicious—it’s harmful.
These aren’t simply random webpages; they’re important sources on every thing from contraception and maternal mortality to LGBTQ+ youth well being and medical trial variety. The form of data that saves lives, helps suppliers, and empowers folks to make knowledgeable selections about their our bodies.
And now? It’s gone—scrubbed from websites just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA with little clarification and nil accountability. If that appears like a struggle on girls, nicely… you’re not improper.
When politics begins dictating what well being data we’re allowed to entry, it’s as much as us to battle again. Which means getting louder, getting smarter, and turning to impartial, science-backed girls’s well being sources that put public well being earlier than political agendas. As a result of nobody—not a politician, not a bureaucrat—will get to determine what we do or don’t need to find out about our personal rattling our bodies.
Why Authorities-Provided Well being Data is Disappearing
For many years, federal well being companies just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA had been go-to sources for reliable medical data. However in latest months, one thing alarming has occurred behind the scenes: 1000’s of pages of ladies’s well being content material have quietly vanished.
This isn’t a coincidence—it’s a calculated shift.
Right here’s what’s been eliminated, why it issues, and who’s being harmed probably the most.
What’s Been Eliminated and Why It Issues
Entry to complete, research-based well being and wellness data is important to the well-being of ladies. But the U.S. authorities has not too long ago modified or eliminated greater than 8,000 pages1,2,4 from federal well being web sites—severely limiting entry to essential medical steering.
These deletions have an effect on sources from the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH), the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC), and the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA). This consists of important public well being data on matters reminiscent of HIV and sexually transmitted ailments, contraceptive utilization and security, medical trial variety, maternal mortality and morbidity, transgender well being, and LGBTQ+ youth well being.1,2,3,4.
Who This Impacts Most
The suppression of this data disproportionately impacts girls, minorities, and different marginalized people.
With out these sources, sufferers, healthcare suppliers, and researchers face vital challenges in making knowledgeable choices about remedy choices, preventive care, and wellness methods.
Eradicating this content material doesn’t simply prohibit entry to information—it undermines progress in gender-specific medical analysis and healthcare fairness.
[SIDEBAR: In December 2024, a report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) found that the NIH has consistently failed to prioritize and fund research on women’s health.⁶ The report called for an additional $16 billion in funding to close the gap.But with the current administration’s clear bias—and what some are calling an outright war on women—the likelihood of that funding materializing is slim to none.]
Fortuitously, there are advocates on the market working to archive this data and make it out there to the general public5. This text accommodates a listing of those recovered sources.
The Political Undermining of Public Well being
Whereas the transition of presidency from one social gathering to a different mustn’t have an effect on the provision of evidence-based well being and wellness data, it has. This alarming development highlights the pressing want for impartial, non-governmental sources of evidence-based well being sources.
The Position of Advocacy Organizations
Fortunately, not all hope is misplaced. Organizations just like the Society for Girls’s Well being Analysis (SWHR) are main the cost to guard and advance girls’s well being via coverage, training, and science.
For instance, SWHR is dedicated to making sure that the “Intercourse as a Organic Variable” coverage stays in place on the NIH—a crucial step in making certain that ailments, remedies, and medical interventions are researched with girls’s distinctive physiology in thoughts.
The well being wants of ladies change throughout the lifespan, from reproductive years via menopause and past, making entry to stage-specific, research-backed sources much more crucial.
Trusted, Proof-Based mostly Girls’s Well being Sources
Under is a curated record of evidence-based, non-governmental sources. These organizations present science-backed steering tailor-made to the distinctive well being considerations of ladies of their reproductive years, through the menopausal transition, and post-menopause. By searching for out and sharing these sources, we will collectively safeguard entry to important well being information and make sure that all girls have the data they should thrive at each stage of life.
Teen/Reproductive Years:
Reproductive Well being Entry Undertaking
Trains and helps main care clinicians to increase entry to reproductive well being care—together with abortion, contraception, and miscarriage care. Presents free, multilingual, evidence-based affected person training supplies and advocates for fairness in medical coaching and care.
Perimenopause/Menopause:
The North American Menopause Society
A number one impartial group providing evidence-based data on menopause and midlife girls’s well being. A trusted useful resource for each healthcare suppliers and the general public.
A number of Life Phases:
The American Faculty of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
A go-to supply for dependable, science-backed girls’s well being data. Empowers sufferers to have knowledgeable conversations with their ob-gyn and take an lively function of their care.
Deliberate Parenthood
A nationwide chief in accessible sexual and reproductive healthcare and training. Advocates for inexpensive, high-quality providers and is the biggest supplier of intercourse training within the U.S.
Our Our bodies Ourselves
Presents rigorously vetted well being and sexuality data that integrates medical experience with lived expertise. Prioritizes inclusivity and facilities the voices of ladies and gender-expansive people.
Wholesome Girls
Centered on girls aged 35 to 64, this group offers medically reviewed, evidence-based content material that helps wholesome growing old and empowered self-advocacy.
Massachusetts Normal Hospital Middle for Girls’s Psychological Well being: Reproductive Psychiatry Useful resource & Info Middle
Presents reproductive psychiatry sources throughout life phases, with specialised assist for BIPOC people searching for culturally aligned care.
Middle for Science within the Public Curiosity
A science-based advocacy group selling public well being via diet, meals coverage reform, and transparency. Prioritizes illness prevention and meals fairness.
Take Cost: Keep Knowledgeable, Keep Empowered
In a time when entry to reliable well being data is being stripped away, staying knowledgeable isn’t simply essential—it’s a type of resistance. Each particular person deserves science-backed, inclusive sources that assist knowledgeable selections, not political agendas.
So bookmark these hyperlinks. Share them with your pals, your shoppers, your healthcare suppliers. Assist the organizations doing the onerous work to maintain this data alive. And above all, don’t let anybody let you know that your well being isn’t value combating for. As a result of it’s. At all times. —Karin
References
- https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/02/upshot/trump-government-websites-missing-pages.html
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/31/federal-agencies-websites-trump/
- https://swhr.org/a-january-2025-policy-recap-from-swhr/
- https://www.reuters.com/enterprise/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-drops-web-pages-improving-clinical-trial-diversity-2025-01-24/
- https://contrarian.substack.com/p/public-health-websites-are-going
- https://www.science.org/content material/article/nih-needs-new-institute-women-s-health-research-expert-panel-says
