Welcome again to a different version of the Roos Lets Free month-to-month mailbag, the place I reply your fantasy hockey questions by giving recommendation that ought to be helpful to all poolies even when they do not personal the particular gamers being mentioned. As a reminder, if you would like your fantasy hockey query(s) answered within the subsequent mailbag, take a look at the tip of the column, the place I clarify the methods to get it/them to me in addition to the small print you must present when sending. The sooner you ship a query the extra probably it’s to be included within the mailbag, and the deeper dive I can present with my reply.
Within the curiosity of full disclosure, just a few of those questions have been curated from outdoors my reader base. I do hope that because the season unfolds extra of you’ll ship me questions. For now although, by way of the questions which weren’t submitted I am going to attempt to contact on issues I really feel are of most curiosity. If you wish to ship me questions, there are directions on how to take action on the finish of the column.
Query #1 (from Rick)
For background, I’ve received my league seven out of the final eight seasons, ending second the opposite time, thanks largely to what I be taught from this superb web site. For this season, I’ve a deep crew with sturdy forwards attributable to purposely ready till the third tier of goalies earlier than selecting any. However all is just not completely effectively with my defensemen.
It is a 10-team, single-season, Roto league, with 25-player rosters (15 starters, 8 bench, 3 IR) and classes are G, A, Pts, SSTP – Particular Groups Pts (PPP + SHP), SOG, Hits, Blocks, GAA, Save %, Wins. Of the starters, 5 are defensemen. I drafted Cale Makar and Zack Werenski, who clearly are doing simply advantageous. However my different picks have been Charlie McAvoy, Ok’Andre Miller, Kris Letang, and Sam Rinzel.
With 10 groups, plus deep benches (8 spots), defenseman expertise thins out quick, and plenty of groups have weak choices for his or her 4th and/or particularly fifth D. The excellent news is meaning mine aren’t unhealthy by comparability, but additionally there aren’t a whole lot of possibility to interchange them. My hope was Rinzel and Letang would fill my final two spots effectively; nevertheless, issues should not shaping up for that to happen. What do you concentrate on Rinzel’s probabilities to win QB1 again? And are these probabilities price ready for?
In the end, I want 2 D to be my 4/5 starters and would like to solely have 1 D on bench. My objective is to improve from Miller and Faulk who’re at the moment in these spots. I’m happy with having 2-4 guys on my roster to rotate out and in to fill 2 beginning spots. As I write this (Be aware: this was a number of weeks in the past) the next defensemen have been free brokers: Artyom Levshunov, Brandt Clarke, John Klingberg, Bowen Byram, Darren Raddyish, and Sean Walker, and that is the remainder of my roster:
C – Robert Thomas, Tim Stutzle, Roope Hintz
LW – Jake Guentzel, Cutter Gauthier, Chris Kreider, Quinton Byfield, Dylan Holloway
RW – JT Miller, Seth Jarvis, Andrei Svechnikov, Kyle Palmieri, Mark Stone, Rickard Rakell
Skater – Dylan Cozens
G – Logan Thompson, Sscott Wedgewood, Pyotr Kochetkov, Karel Vejmelka, Jet Greaves
First off, my guess is Levshunov has lengthy since been grabbed, as have Byram and Raddyish. If I used to be in your footwear, I would have grabbed Levshunov the second he entered the image, to cowl your bases. Sure, that will imply you’d not be capable of as simply rotate three d-men for 2 spots; nevertheless, in instances like these, it often turns into obvious who “the man” will probably be, making it simpler to drop the opposite. Or to place it one other method, maybe Levshunov shines brightly, however solely briefly. In that case, you can’ve dropped him and nonetheless had Rinzel. However as issues look now, and with Levshunov having second general draft decide pedigree, Rinzel might need a troublesome time being impactful this season.
Letang is enjoying poorly once more, and his “banger” stats are also less than par for him. He’s displaying his age. However as you mentioned, he is a troublesome drop, since he is ostensibly an Erik Karlsson damage away from PP1. Or is he? Do not forget that the Pens used a 5F PP1 at occasions final season; so I am unsure that if Karlsson received damage Letang can be gifted the position of PP1 QB once more. However he nonetheless may be price holding.
Faulk is faring a bit higher than Letang; nevertheless, as I write this Faulk has 13 factors, six of which got here in three video games the place he had two factors every. What meaning is he had seven factors in his different 26 video games. However he’s extra so within the PP image than Letang, and practically half his factors have include the person benefit, though technically the identical is true for Letang (truly precisely half), besides fewer general factors. Faulk probably is a maintain as effectively, until somebody is obviously higher.
Listed below are some names of defensemen who may be accessible and price contemplating. For one, there’s Hampus Lindholm, who, surprisingly, has been placed on PP1 throughout McAvoy’s absence, relatively than Mason Lohrei. The difficulty is he by no means hits, and his blocks do not compensate. Joel Edmundson is scoring effectively and taking the ice largely within the offensive zone; however he has no PP deployment, and he hits and blocks across the identical fee as Faulk or Letang. John Marino is scoring decently, however missing in PP deployment and never doing beautifully in banger stats. There’s additionally Dylan Demelo, who’s scoring okay and hitting and blocking fairly effectively, however not sniffing any PP time. Lastly, there’s Denton Mateychuk, who appears to be getting not solely extra ice time however higher deployment, plus he’s big for blocks and never unhealthy for factors or scoring.
If none who have been on the market once you despatched in your query are left to choose up, and also you resolve to drop Rinzel, my intestine can be to go together with Demelo or Mateychuk. That having been mentioned, based mostly on the alternatives accessible once you despatched in your query, my sense is there might be higher choices than them. Or to place it one other method, it may be there are all the time a handful of defensemen who you can make a case for being higher than the worst you could have in your roster now. If not by way of, Rinzel may be price holding as Levshunov insurance coverage, however if you wish to transfer on from him, then grin and bear it/them with regard to Faulk and Letang and go for Demelo or Mateychuk rather than Rinzel. Good luck!
Query #2 (from Marc)
I am in a 15 crew dynasty cap league, with factors solely scoring for skaters (finest 13 skaters depend). Every crew will get 10 keepers, plus routinely can preserve – with out having them depend as one of many 10 – any participant who has performed fewer than 100 NHL video games.
I’ve over $6M in cap area and attempting to flip Oliver Bjorkstrand. House owners of Bryan Rust, Chris Kreider, and Dylan Holloway despatched me low-cost affords and house owners of Bo Horvat and Kevin Fiala despatched me expensive affords the place i must hand over very excessive decide plus a prospect (Berkly Catton, Ty Iginla, Beckett Sennecke, Jimmy Snuggerrud, James Hagens). I’m leaning towards Rust or Kreider since I have already got my 10 keepers and the distinction is just not price it in my thoughts. Can Holloway flip issues round although? Is Kreider’s manufacturing sustainable? Rust is usually injured and the crew round him is so previous, that I am involved. Possibly you could have an underachieving participant in thoughts which may flip issues round and surpass these decisions points-wise?
Since Marc despatched this in, Bjorkstand has gone ice chilly. However he has remained on PP1 for essentially the most half, which is an enormous deal. For the second quarter, he is enjoying most frequently with Jake Guentzel, so there’s hope. Attempting to commerce him at this cut-off date although can be troublesome, or quantity to promoting low; and I do not see him with the ability to be was any of the gamers you talked about. As you additionally famous, he might be dealt for an additional underperformer who figures to do higher going ahead.
Somebody I would have a look at is Barrett Hayton, especiallywith Logan Cooley sidelined. Hayton remains to be within the high six, albeit on PP2. Vasily Podkolzin appears to be entrenched within the high six however his IPP is 44.4%. He is getting principally zero PP time, though the Edmonton high six is a reasonably good spot. Others whose IPPs are unsustainably decrease are Jake DeBrusk, Jonathan Marchessault, and Sean Monahan.
Taking a look at gamers whose crew SH% at 5×5 may be very low, Winnipeg is taking pictures – this isn’t a typo – 2.7% at 5×5 when Cole Perfetti is on the ice. Not practically as low, however nonetheless too low, are Joel Farabee (5.7%), Fiala (5.4%), Matt Coronato (6.8%), and Pavel Dorofeyev (6.0%). Then there’s Jack Quinn, who solely has 15 factors however all however one are targets or main assists, which means one secondary help. Dorofeyev solely has one as effectively. Connor McMichael additionally has a mere one secondary help amongst his 11 complete. Dorofeyev additionally has already been unfortunate sufficient to have hit three crossbars and two posts, and Fiala has hit 4 crossbars and two posts. I would say Dorofeyev, Fiala, or McMichael are purchase lows.
As for Holloway, apparently solely 16.5% of his SOG have missed the online; but he solely has seven targets and is taking pictures 11.1%. Extra targets ought to be coming. In any other case, it is a case of what to consider, as final season his IPPs have been fairly good, however this season they’re very low. Even when final yr they weren’t what we must always come to anticipate, chances are high they need to be increased than now. I believe Holloway is an efficient one to hunt in commerce as effectively. Additionally, in case in some way Rust or Krieder are nonetheless within the combine, I would have a look at Rust, as he is a confirmed 75-point participant, which is kind of strong. Kreider is in an amazing spot; nevertheless, that was the case in New York and he thrived as soon as however then got here again to earth in subsequent seasons, so I would not pursue him. Good luck!
Query #3 (additionally from Marc)
I am in a ten crew dynasty, no cap, factors solely, 6 forwards, 4 defensemen, 5 keepers league. My keepers have been Martin Necas, Matthew Tkachuk, Robert Thomas, Jason Robertson, and Zach Werenski, plus I even have Dougie Hamilton, Charlie McAvoy, Darren Raddysh, Marci Rossi, and Jimmy Snuggerud (an autokeep attributable to having beneath 100 NHL video games performed on the finish of this season).
I’m having bother figuring out Necas’ worth. Are his numbers inflated due to Mack? If that’s the case, by how a lot? For those who had him on this league, who would you attempt to goal in commerce? Additionally, what’s your tackle Snuggerud?
I believe Necas is a participant who will not get you as a lot as you assume in commerce. Sure, he’ll be in Colorado for years to return. Presumably meaning he’ll proceed to be tethered to Nathan Mackinnon like he’s now. However return in time and bear in mind when Mikko Rantanen was an Av. It appeared he was by no means valued as extremely as he ought to’ve been. A part of that’s as a result of enjoying with MacKinnon is just not completely nice. The difficulty is Mac tends to have a degree – be it the objective itself or an help – on most each objective that’s scored when he’s on the ice. Plus, there’s additionally Cale Makar. In consequence, you could have one or perhaps two different factors for all the opposite gamers on the ice. Within the case of Rantanen, that resulted in him being a 100- to 105-point participant nearly yearly. And guess what – Necas’ tempo practically the identical! However the distinction is Necas’ SH% is near double his profession fee, and he began scorching final season earlier than coming again to earth. Even with 5 factors in his final two video games as I write this, that places him barely over a degree per sport in his final 9 contests. Additionally, Colorado is taking pictures a virtually unfathomable 14.5% at 5×5 whereas Necas is on the ice, and his PDO is sort of 1100, which is stratospheric and in no universe sustainable.
It looks as if Necas may fall under the century mark in scoring fee. I do not anticipate for the underside to fall out from beneath him fully; nevertheless, the tempo he is on now’s probably too excessive, or if not too excessive then not one thing he can be very more likely to surpass.
Who would I goal if in search of to commerce him? For those who can in some way flip him into Jason Robertson or Wyatt Johnson, I would try this in a heartbeat, and it might be doable since people may be involved they’re going to revert to their not as excellent 2024-25 numbers when in reality they could get even higher, as they’re lastly being given the ice occasions they deserve and are thriving. In order for you a “Regular Eddie” then you may’t actually go fallacious with Kyle Connor. He is received 90-point draw back and 100+ level upside and isn’t a lot older than Necas. In the identical vein, all Nick Suzuki has achieved is get higher each single season he is been within the NHL, and he is on the right track to take action once more. When you have a tolerance for danger, there’s all the time Jack Hughes, who has had main damage points and appears snake bit, however when he performs he has 100-point draw back and might be the following Mac if he manages to remain wholesome. These are the gamers who I would goal If dealing Necas.
So far as Snuggerud, there has not been as a lot to get enthusiastic about to this point. Granted, he is nonetheless solely 21 years previous; nevertheless, I am involved that he has a mixture I do not wish to see, which is a low crew SH% at 5×5 (7.6%) and IPPs which aren’t excessive, at 61.1% general and 50% on the PP. When thought of collectively, this means that not a whole lot of offense is occurring when he is on the ice, and he hasn’t been factoring into what offense there’s been. Additionally not excellent is that this occurring regardless of him enjoying alongside a number of the better of one of the best on St. Louis. Nonetheless, he’s solely 21, and I believe it is method too early to contemplate parting methods with him. I would preach endurance. Good luck!
Query #4 (from Anne)
I’m in a 12 crew Yahoo public factors pool. Factors for skaters are: G – 6, A -4, plus/minus – 2, ppp – 2, pictures – 0.9, and blocks – 1. Factors for goalies are: Wins – 5, Objectives in opposition to – unfavorable 3, saves – 0.6, shutouts – 5. Roster positions are two C, two L, two R, 4 D, two G, 4 bench and two IR.
My crew is – Leo Carlsson C, Adam Fantilli C, Jesper Bratt L/R, Trevor Zegras C/L/R, Artturi Lehkonen L/R, Kirill Marchenko R, Nikita Kucherov R, Elias Pettersson C/L, Pavel Dorofeyev L/R, Seth Jones, Artyom Levshunov, Zach Werenski, Mikhail Sergachev, Jet Greaves, Joey Daccord, Jesper Wallstedt.
Two weeks in the past I proposed a commerce – my Carlsson for Rasmus Dahlin. I used to be considering Carlsson was due for a slowdown and Dahlin was a buy-low. Plus I believed my protection was fairly weak and with 4 D-men beginning, good d-men are very priceless. The commerce was accepted however then vetoed on Nov nineteenth. The opposite aspect appealed the veto to the Yahoo league workplace however the enchantment was rejected. Was I loopy to supply this deal? Ought to the commerce have been vetoed?
My crew began out with three straight losses however is now 4 and three. Does this seem like a middle-of-the highway crew going ahead? Additionally, ought to I supply up Kucherov for Cale Makar?
Carlsson slowed in November, then proceeded to rattle off ten factors in his subsequent eight video games, however now has zero in his final two. So he won’t be a 100 level participant…but. Would I commerce Carlsson to get Dahlin? Possibly if there was extra emphasis on banger classes; nevertheless, even with blocks counting for a full level, I do not assume that raises Dahlin’s worth practically sufficient, particularly with +/- being a two-point class and Buffalo being weak in that space now. Additionally, Dahlin’s SOG fee is way decrease this season, which additional undercuts his worth. Briefly, Dahlin is now not sufficient to get in return for Carlsson.
However ought to the commerce have been vetoed? That relies upon. Inserting apart Yahoo components, totally different leagues have totally different standards for what makes a commerce vetoable, and the standards after all will differ relying on whether or not it is a one yr league or a keeper. The difficulty is all the time that no two trades may be in contrast. By that I imply it is usually troublesome to land on the magic line the place, on the one hand, a commerce is vetoable, however on the opposite, it’s not. My private view is that if a commerce represents two GMs coming collectively and deciding they wish to make a deal, they need to be allowed to take action in a keeper. In a one yr league, then there might be doable bases for trades not being cheap, because it’s all about this season and there may be no foundation to worth the gamers for his or her future affect or keeper potential.
If a league finds that one or two particular GMs are the centre of the vetoable trades, usually one of the best ways to deal with it’s by in search of to interchange them. I’ve seen as many, if no more, leagues have points when trades are meddled with and vetoed than with iffy trades being allowed to face. If there’s a need although amongst all GMs to have trades scrutinized, then one of the best ways for that to happen is a indifferent individual makes the choice, particularly somebody with fantasy hockey data however not a member of the league. In any other case, to veto a commerce it ought to take all different GMs who should not straight concerned voting in opposition to the commerce. I do under no circumstances advocate an in-league commissioner, since what if they’re concerned within the deal? And who’s to say they converse for everybody? Lengthy story quick, commerce vetoes appear to be a good suggestion, however very often then could be a web unfavorable so assume lengthy and arduous as as to whether your league desires to permit vetoes, and, if that’s the case, on what foundation/bases.
As for Kucherov for Makar, I see no universe the place the Makar proprietor accepts that commerce. Make no mistake – Kucherov is a famous person; however after a 144-point season, his scoring tempo dropped to 127 final season and is at 112 for 2025-26 to this point, which might mark a low since 2019-20. He’ll be 33 years previous subsequent season, which means this might certainly be a decelerate. He is additionally not helped by the crew round him not being as potent as when the Lightning have been perennial Cup contenders. In the meantime, Makar has three-straight 90+ level scoring fee seasons, and for 2025-26 is pacing for over 100 factors. For context, the record of defensemen relationship again to 1980-81 who had a scoring fee of 1.1+ per sport not less than 4 occasions by age 26 and inside their first seven profession seasons, as Makar has, consists of only one different rearguard, particularly Paul Coffey. Like Makar, Coffey performed for prime octane offenses, however he additionally was very good, that’s till getting damage. Ray Bourque, who additionally was superb for over a decade, solely did so 3 times, and simply Quinn Hughes and Brian Leetch did so twice. So sure, Makar is a unicorn. Extra importantly, his house owners know this. The record of gamers who would possibly – emphasis on would possibly – get a Makar proprietor to take heed to commerce affords consists probably of solely Connor McDavid and, mockingly, Nathan MacKinnon. Possibly by the tip of this season Connor Bedard and Macklin Celebrini might be added. However as of now it is simply these two, not Kucherov. So do make the supply, however be ready for a tough no as a response.
As for my evaluation of this crew, I really feel it’s higher than center of the pack. Wanting on the variety of gamers you personal, and projecting that to 11 different groups, I’ve to assume just a few are a extra stacked than yours. You will probably win greater than you lose, however not be capable of compete with one of the best of one of the best. Sorry – I hope I am fallacious, and good luck!
Query #5 (from Daniel)
As a Mackenzie Blackwood proprietor, I am left scratching my head as to why he hasn’t develop into the #1 or not less than 1A by now for Colorado. I notice Scott Wedgewood is enjoying very effectively; however why would the Avs have signed Blackwood for what they did if to not have him be the starter and on condition that he has performed effectively general? Do you assume there’s an opportunity him and Wedgewood proceed to alternate begins over the whole season?
Colorado is rolling now, they usually probably determine why repair what is not damaged. This being mentioned, I additionally consider the Avs will probably be good sufficient to recollect what occurred to Boston in 2022-23, as they completed with one of the best common season report in NHL historical past, solely to be crushed in spherical one of many playoffs. And plenty of, myself included, attributed it to the truth that Boston by no means departed from Linus Ullmark and Jeremy Swayman alternating begins for principally the whole season. When the playoffs began, and Ullmark was requested to play a number of video games in a row for what was primarily the primary time all season, he faltered.
Additionally, with goalies, you actually do comply with the cash. And looking out on the netminders who’ve performed 50+ video games in any of the previous three seasons, none have been earmarked as true back-ups to start out the season. In Wedgewood’s case, he would possibly hit 50 video games performed because of the video games missed by Blackwood on the outset of the season; nevertheless, I really feel that because the marketing campaign goes on you will notice increasingly more of Blackwood. Additionally, Wedgewood has by no means performed even 40 video games in a season, so its not clear he’d be up for the trials of greater than, particularly since he is 33 years previous and shouldered a big workload early on. Past these components, he has solely as soon as completed a season with a High quality Begin Proportion over 50%. Or to place it one other method, there is a motive he is a back-up inked to a one-year deal paying him $1.5M per season, whereas Blackwood is incomes $5.3M.
To you and different Blackwood house owners, I believe the time will come within the not too distant future the place he will probably be again to beginning not less than two out of each three video games, and maybe at the next fee than that because the playoffs strategy. The truth is, him with the ability to begin two video games in a row attributable to Wedgewood getting damage may be what turns the occasions. In different phrases, do not panic. As for the way effectively Blackwood might in the end play, that is one other story, as he very effectively may find yourself as Alexandar Georgiev 2.0, with heaps of wins however awful peripherals. Good luck!
************************
To get mailbag inquiries to me both (1) e-mail them to [email protected] with the phrases “Roos Mailbag” as the topic line, or (2) ship them to me by way of a non-public message on the DobberHockey Boards, the place my username is “rizzeedizzee”.
When sending me your questions, bear in mind to supply as a lot element about your league/scenario as doable. Examples of issues I must know embrace what sort of league you are in (i.e., restricted keeper, dynasty, or one-year; roto vs. H2H; public sale – if that’s the case, what the finances is – or non-auction), what number of groups are within the league, does the wage cap matter, what number of gamers are rostered (and of these, what number of begin at every place in addition to what number of bench and/or IR spots there are), what classes are scored and the way are they weighted, plus different particulars if pertinent. In case your query entails whether or not to choose up or drop a participant, give me an inventory of high free brokers accessible and let me know if the variety of pick-ups is proscribed or if there’s a precedence system for pick-ups. For those who’re considering of constructing a commerce, it will be good to know not solely the roster of the opposite crew you would possibly commerce with but additionally the place you stand in your classes. In case your query entails keepers, along with giving me the choices for who to maintain, let me know if offseason buying and selling is allowed and to what extent it’s a viable possibility given your league. In sum, the secret is to inform me sufficient for me to offer you a really correct reply, and for readers of this column to profit from the reply/recommendation I present. When unsure, it is best to err on the aspect of inclusion since I can all the time omit or disregard issues that do not matter.
